Your agent, with Infino vs. without Infino.

You are looking at the same agent put to an A/B test panel: Claude Code with no modifications. Infino handles far more than code, but coding agents are ubiquitous and simple to test. In the demo below, one panel has Claude Code's default File Tools + Infino MCP tools, while the other panel has only File Tools. Each A/B panel is the agent's answer, its latency, and its bill.

What to do: pick a model and a corpus, select a suggested question or type one in the text box, then hit run. Both sides start at once. Watch which one finishes, what it cites, and what it cost. Note that on open source repos that frontier models have already trained on, Infino impact is less.

The same model with file tools and with Infino Haiku, Sonnet, Opus, and Fable. Bill, fully correct of 36, and time. Grey is file tools. Orange is Infino. Bill Correct, of 36 Time Haiku $1.86 $1.09 15 23 14s 11s Sonnet $8.73 $3.66 18 20 41s 20s Opus $6.32 $4.68 25 25 16s 15s Fable $19.36 $16.69 25 22 28s 24s file tools Infino

Benchmark across 36 code-related questions. See the repo →

Point Infino at your own repo.

pip install infinoquickstart →

Go deeper: playground · hybrid search · docs ↗